During the open enrollment period for 2014 healthcare insurance a few months ago, my wife and I chose the AARP Medicare Rx Preferred plan offered by United Healthcare, the largest health insurance provider in America. How could we go wrong? A United Healthcare unit had been chosen to fix the healthcare.gov website. They are reputed to be a company with the technical expertise to make the health care system run more efficiently. Efficiency is desperately needed in healthcare. How efficient is United Healthcare?
Three months after enrolling in the United Healthcare AARP MedicareRx Preferred plan, I received their Coupon Payment Book. Yes, a physical paper payment book with printed coupons in it along with 12 envelopes in which to return checks for my monthly premium payment. The last coupon book I can recall was when I bought my first car in 1967. I cannot remember the last time I wrote a check. My wife also received the same set of coupons and envelopes. This is the digital 21st century, but our nation’s largest healthcare insurance company is using coupon books. They do offer the option of automated deductions of the monthly payments from either the social security payment or by a deduction directly from a checking account.
Many services provide for automatic deductions from your checking account and can be set up online and be activated in minutes if not instantly. Not so with our nation’s largest healthcare insurance company. They require that you fill out a paper form and send it with a check. Then they say, “If you choose a payment method such as deduction from your Social Security benefit check or EFT, it may take up to three months to begin. Continue to mail checks and coupons until you receive a letter from us”.
I do not like to make negative statements on patrickWeb about individual companies, but I must say that I find United Healthcare more than disappointing. As an American citizen and taxpayer, I am embarrassed to receive a coupon book and 12 envelopes in the mail. United Healthcare gave its top executive a compensation package valued at about $13.9 million last year. I am confident he doesn’t write checks and probably doesn’t even know his company is following antiquated practices. Bill Gates once called the major banks “dinosaurs”. I wonder what he would say about this healthcare behemoth. Many people say the government is incompetent and we should turn healthcare administration over to the private sector. If the healthcare insurance leader is using thirty-year old coupon and check technology, do we want to turn administration over to them?
This post is partly a rant, but mostly about a serious issue — the cost of American healthcare. We spend more than two-and-a-half times as much as most developed countries in the world, including relatively rich European countries like France, Sweden and the United Kingdom. There are numerous reasons why our healthcare is so expensive, but, in part, higher costs arise because the U.S. has been slow to adopt progressive information and communications technology to improve the administration of healthcare and to reduce waste. In Sweden, all drug prescriptions are “written” electronically — a message is sent directly from the doctor’s office to the pharmacy. Not only does this cut down on medical errors, it also reduces pharmacist workload. E-prescribing is rolling out in the U.S. also, but adoption has a long way to go.
So much for the rant. What do I recommend? I will be writing much more about this, but, in a nutshell, I believe the best solution is for the government — yes, the government has a role — should mandate payment standards. Hospitals and doctors must adhere to uniform accounting standards to report their financial performance, but they can use whatever electronic medical record system they want, or chose to use none. There are 250+ EMR vendors and they are less than compatible. Germany has 300+ healthcare insurance companies, but they all must comply with certain standards. That is the first part of what we need. Second, healthcare administration should be done at the state level. New York, Ohio, Florida, and Texas are truly different, and they are all large enough (all are larger than Sweden) to fund and develop efficient information technology systems.
There is obviously much more to this topic and I have other recommendations. As I wrap up my doctoral journey, I will be writing much more the subject. Stay tuned.